![]() This is largely due to its sound architecture, open interface, minimal system resource utilization, excellent sound effects, a large number of function extension plug-ins (both official and third-party), and a lot number of customizable skins. Because he was unhappy with Winamp 2.x’s plugin system structure and Winamp 3’s more graphical- and skin-inclined development direction, he came up with foobar2000 this revolutionary advanced audio player.įoobar2000 has numerous contributors and loyal users around the world. Peter Pawlowski was a member of Nullsoft, the original development company of Winamp, and wrote plug-ins specifically for Winamp. In other words, foobar2000 is only suitable for advanced computer users who like to play around with powerful software (not for AppNee).įoobar2000 (fb2k for short) is a minimalist but not simple, expert-level digital music player, developed by Peter Pawlowski from Russia in 2002. So, Winamp is actually more popular and has more users than foobar2000, just like the relationship between WinRAR and 7-Zip. By contrast, the former focuses on exquisite appearance and ease of use, while the latter is for power users to chew over. ![]() Over the last 20 years, the most popular two music players on Windows have been Winamp and foobar2000. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |